Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized how we interact with AI. Understanding their inner workings is essential for effective prompt engineering and AI application development. In 2026, the landscape includes both instruction models and dedicated reasoning models—each with distinct architectures and behaviors.
Transformer Architecture
At the heart of modern LLMs lies the Transformer architecture:
Self-Attention Mechanism
The key innovation that allows models to understand context and relationships between words:
- Query, Key, Value matrices: How the model processes information
- Multi-head attention: Parallel processing of different types of relationships
- Position encoding: How models understand word order
Architecture Components
-
Encoder-Decoder vs Decoder-Only
- GPT series (GPT-4o, o3): Decoder-only (autoregressive)
- BERT: Encoder-only (bidirectional)
- T5: Encoder-Decoder (seq2seq)
-
Layer Structure
- Multi-head self-attention
- Feed-forward networks
- Residual connections
- Layer normalization
Training Process
Pre-training
The foundation of LLM capabilities:
- Unsupervised learning on massive text corpora
- Next token prediction as the primary objective
- Emergent behaviors arising from scale
Fine-tuning Approaches (2026)
The field has evolved significantly from RLHF alone:
-
Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT)
- Task-specific training on labeled data
- Instruction following capabilities
- Still the foundation of most models
-
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
- Aligning models with human preferences
- Improving safety and helpfulness
- Industry standard since 2023
-
Constitutional AI (Anthropic)
- Models trained against a set of principles (constitution)
- Reduces need for human feedback
- Improves alignment without RLHF alone
-
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
- More efficient than RLHF
- Directly optimizes for human preferences
- Becoming mainstream in 2025-2026
-
RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback)
- Models trained using feedback from other (stronger) models
- Reduces human labeling costs
- Effective for scaling alignment
-
Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning
- LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
- Prefix tuning
- Adapter methods
- Enables cost-effective customization
Key Capabilities
Emergent Abilities
Capabilities that appear at scale:
- In-context learning: Learning from examples within prompts
- Chain-of-thought reasoning: Step-by-step problem solving (in instruction models)
- Few-shot generalization: Adapting to new tasks with minimal examples
- Tool use: Integrating external APIs and functions
- Multimodal understanding: Processing images, audio, and video
Limitations and Challenges
- Hallucination: Generating plausible but incorrect information
- Context length: Historically limited; now up to 1M tokens in some models
- Bias and fairness: Inherited from training data
- Consistency: Variation in responses to similar prompts
Model Scaling Laws
Understanding how performance improves with scale:
- Parameter count: More parameters generally mean better performance
- Training data: Quality and quantity both matter
- Compute budget: Optimal allocation between model size and training time
- Mixture of Experts (MoE): Scaling parameters efficiently by activating relevant subsets
Recent Advances in 2026
The field has evolved dramatically:
Mixture of Experts (MoE)
Now standard on GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and other major models. Instead of using all parameters for every token, MoE selectively activates relevant "expert" subnetworks. This enables:
- Larger effective model size with similar computational cost
- Faster inference on simpler tasks
- Better scaling characteristics
Reasoning Models with Internal Thinking Phases
OpenAI o1, o3, and o3-mini introduce a dedicated reasoning phase:
- Before output generation, the model performs extended reasoning
- This thinking process is hidden by default (but can be displayed in supported APIs)
- Models can spend more compute on harder problems
- No need for explicit chain-of-thought prompts; reasoning happens internally
Key insight: These models follow a different pipeline than instruction models—they reason first, then generate output, rather than generating step-by-step reasoning as part of the output.
Multimodal is Standard
All major models now support:
- Text input/output
- Image input/output
- Audio input (in some models)
- Video understanding (in some models)
Multimodal is no longer a "special feature"—it's baseline.
Extended Context Windows
- GPT-4o: 128k tokens
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 200k tokens
- Gemini 2.0 Flash/Pro: 1M+ tokens
- DeepSeek R1: 128k tokens
Large context windows enable:
- Many-shot prompting (dozens of examples)
- Processing entire documents or codebases
- Maintaining long conversations
- Reducing need for external retrieval
AI Agents and Tool Use
Built-in agent capabilities and tool-use APIs allow models to:
- Call external functions autonomously
- Break down complex tasks into steps
- Use web search, calculators, APIs
- Return to earlier steps if needed
- Run multi-step workflows without human intervention
Examples: OpenAI Operator, Claude Agents, Gemini's Agent API.
The 2026 Model Landscape
Understanding the distinct models and their strengths helps you choose the right tool:
OpenAI
- GPT-4o: Best general-purpose instruction model; excellent for all tasks except very hard reasoning; 128k context; fastest for many workloads; multimodal
- o1: Reasoning model; excels at math, coding, complex logic; slower and more expensive; internal reasoning phase; 128k context
- o3: Latest reasoning model; stronger than o1 on benchmarks; faster o3-mini variant available; better for complex problems; 128k context
Anthropic
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Instruction model; 200k context window; extended thinking mode (reasoning-like capability); excellent for long-form work; strong at agentic tasks; multimodal
- Best for: Long documents, agent orchestration, nuanced analysis
- Gemini 2.0 Flash: Fastest instruction model; 1M+ token context; native multimodal (images, video); best cost-performance for many tasks
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: Most capable instruction model; 1M+ token context; stronger reasoning within instruction framework; better quality
- Best for: Massive context, video understanding, real-time applications
xAI
- Grok 3: Powerful general model; real-time knowledge; good all-rounder; available via API
- Best for: Tasks requiring current information
Open-Source
- DeepSeek R1/V3: Competitive reasoning model; free to use locally or via API; open weights; strong math and coding
- Best for: Open-source enthusiasts, local deployment, cost-sensitive applications
Practical Implications
For Prompt Engineers
- Understanding attention helps design better prompts
- Knowledge of training objectives informs effective instruction design
- Awareness of model differences (instruction vs reasoning) is critical
- Knowing context window sizes allows leveraging many-shot and long documents
- Understanding MoE helps explain model behavior on simple vs complex tasks
For Developers
- Model selection based on capability requirements (reasoning models for hard problems, instruction models for general tasks)
- Cost-performance tradeoffs: Gemini 2.0 Flash for efficiency, GPT-4o for quality, o3 for very hard problems
- Integration considerations: Tool-use APIs, agent frameworks, structured outputs
- Context window choice affects information retrieval strategy
Key 2026 Insights for Prompt Engineers
- Reasoning models think differently: Don't use "let's think step by step" with o1/o3; let them reason internally
- Few-shot works differently: Helps instruction models, can hurt reasoning models
- Context is now abundant: With 200k-1M tokens, change your approach to include more examples, full documents, or raw data
- Agents replace prompt chains: Instead of manually chaining prompts, use agent APIs
- Multimodal is default: Include images, video, audio when relevant
- Constitutional AI improves alignment: Models are safer and more aligned by design
- Mixture of Experts is standard: Models activate different components for different tasks
Understanding these fundamentals enables more effective use of LLMs and better prediction of their behavior in various applications.
Apply What You've Learned
Now that you understand how LLMs work, put that knowledge into practice:
- The Evolution of Prompt Engineering in 2026: From Basic Queries to Agentic AI — See how understanding LLM architecture led to better prompting techniques and agent design.
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting in 2026 — Use your knowledge of reasoning to understand when explicit CoT helps vs when models reason internally.
- Few-Shot Learning Explained in 2026 — Leverage in-context learning; understand why it works differently on different models.
- Free ChatGPT Prompt Library — 60+ templates designed with these principles in mind.
